Andover Middle School in Miami, Florida (FL)



121 NE 207TH ST
Miami, FL 33179

Show street view No street view available for this location

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (305) 654-2727 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 13
School number: 6023
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: DADE
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (305) 624-2728
Principal: Arnold R Montgomery
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status: Title 1 school not in need of improvement
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 17
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 104
Senate District: 33
School Web Address: http://andover.dadeschools.net/andover

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

64%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
ANDOVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

59%
State average from 612 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

89%
State average from 613 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

39%
State average from 612 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

72%
State average from 613 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

68%
State average from 612 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
ANDOVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

69%
State average from 613 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
ANDOVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

73%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

533
State average from 613 schools:

545
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
ANDOVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

81%
State average from 614 schools:

56%
Minority Rate
Here:

99%
State average from 614 schools:

49%
Region: 5

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 710 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 710 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 672
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 650

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 672
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 651
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 645 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 645 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
ANDOVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 611
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 589

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
ANDOVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 611
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 590
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 580 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 580 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 549
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 537

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 549
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 538
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 39 (100%)
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 46 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 46 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

57%
State average from 613 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

44%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

94%
State average from 613 schools:

92%
Meeting High Standards in Science
ANDOVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

39%
State average from 613 schools:

49%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

59%
State average from 613 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

38%
State average from 613 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

68%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

33%
State average from 613 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

432
State average from 613 schools:

553
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: NO

Grade in 2009: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

79%
State average from 613 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
Here:

99%
State average from 613 schools:

48%
Region: 5


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 296 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 296 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
ANDOVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 282
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 272

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 282
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 272
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 259 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 259 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 247
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 238

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
ANDOVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 247
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 238
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 234 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 234 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 221
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 215

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 221
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 215
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1669
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

304
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

19%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
ANDOVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

23%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

38%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

15%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
ANDOVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

58%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
ANDOVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

13
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1795
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

13%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

22%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

40%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

18%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

64%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1677
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

22%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

26%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

36%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
ANDOVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

13%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

51%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1815
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

312
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

16%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

24%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

36%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

18%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
ANDOVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

6%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
ANDOVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

60%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
ANDOVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1639
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

298
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1624
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

298
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Miami, FL
  5. Andover Middle School in Miami, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.